Video

90 minute video

In recent years, the U.S. government has elevated the status of international development support, often touting it as a key pillar of national security policy alongside defense and diplomacy. What are the advantages, disadvantages and limits of the connection between development and national security? Does this reflect a fundamental shift in U.S. understanding of national security or an ephemeral fad susceptible to budget politics? How do national security and national interest relate to various elements of development policy, ranging from humanitarian work to climate change mitigation and adaptation, and from the eradication of extreme poverty to democratization and human rights?

Video

USAID Administrator Raj Shah announces that the Obama administration is committing $450 million over the next three years to the GAVI Alliance — and he congratulates ONE members who raised their voices to help make it happen. This funding will help immunize more than 250 million children, averting 4 million premature childhood deaths.

Link

Excerpt:

I have criticised the aid model adopted by the US in previous decades, but the aid model does have its merits in the post-recession age. Not only does it “aggressively” pursue investment results, it rewards governments that comply with transparency and effective governance requirements with continued flow of aid cash. This is precisely what has been lacking from previous “just throw mounds of cash at the problem” aid models.